I Tried Every Task Management Method. Here's What Actually Works.
Getting Things Done. The Eisenhower Matrix. Eat the Frog. Pomodoro. Bullet journaling. Kanban boards. I've tried them all.
And you know what? They all work.
For about two weeks.
Then life gets messy, the system falls apart, and I'm back to square one with a notebook full of abandoned frameworks and a growing sense that maybe I'm just fundamentally bad at being a functional adult.
Spoiler: I wasn't bad at it. The systems were just too damn complicated for real life.
The Productivity System Cycle
Maybe you've experienced this too:
Week 1: Excitement
You discover a new productivity system. You watch all the YouTube videos. You buy the perfect notebook or app. You spend three hours setting everything up meticulously. This time will be different.
Week 2: Honeymoon
It's working! You're so organized! You're on top of everything! You're that person now. You tell your friends about this amazing new system and they should totally try it.
Week 3: Cracks
The system requires... a lot of maintenance. You miss a daily review. Then another. Things start falling through the cracks. But it's fine, you can get back on track, right?
Week 4: Abandonment
You stop using it entirely. Maybe the system was too rigid. Maybe you didn't have time for all the processing steps. Maybe it just felt like you were spending more time organizing your work than actually... doing your work.
Week 5: Discovery
You find a different system that looks even better. And the cycle repeats. Again.
What I Learned From All These Systems
After trying approximately one million task management methods (okay, maybe more like 20, but it feels like a million), here's what I figured out:
Most systems are over-engineered
GTD is brilliant. Genuinely. It's also incredibly complex with contexts, next actions, someday/maybe lists, weekly reviews, processing inboxes... I spent more time managing the system than actually doing things. Which kind of defeats the purpose?
Theory doesn't survive contact with reality
The Eisenhower Matrix makes perfect sense on paper. Urgent/important, urgent/not important, etc. Clean quadrants. Very logical. But in practice? Everything feels urgent when your boss is Slacking you about it. The neat categories fall apart real fast.
Maintenance kills adoption
If a system requires 30 minutes of daily maintenance or weekly reviews, it won't survive busy weeks. And all weeks eventually become busy weeks.
One-size-fits-all doesn't fit anyone
These systems are designed for generic "knowledge workers." But my Tuesday doesn't look like your Tuesday. My brain doesn't work like the system designer's brain.
What Actually Works (For Me, At Least)
After all this experimentation, I landed on something embarrassingly simple. So simple it feels like I wasted years overcomplicating things.
Here's the entire system:
The Whole System (seriously, this is it):
- 1. Everything goes in one place
- 2. I only plan what I'm doing today
- 3. I categorize by energy, not priority
- 4. If it's not getting done, I delete it
That's it. Four rules. Let me break down why each one matters:
1. Everything Goes in One Place
No inbox, no contexts, no separate work/personal lists. One list. That's it.
If I think of something, it goes there immediately. No deciding which category. No organizing. Just: brain thinks of thing, thing goes on list.
This removes the "which list does this go on?" paralysis that used to stop me from writing things down at all. Because by the time I decided where to put it, I'd forgotten what it was.
2. I Only Plan Today
Every morning (or the night before, if I'm feeling organized), I look at that master list and decide what I'm doing today. Not this week. Not tomorrow. Just today.
If something doesn't make it onto today's plan, that's fine. It might make tomorrow's. Or not. We'll figure it out when tomorrow becomes today.
3. I Categorize by Energy, Not Priority
This was the game-changer. Instead of urgent/important, I group tasks by what kind of energy they need:
- Deep work: Needs serious focus and mental energy
- Quick wins: Easy tasks I can knock out when I'm tired
- Recharge: Things that give me energy (breaks, hobbies, exercise)
Now I can match my tasks to my actual energy level throughout the day. Feeling sharp? Deep work. Brain fried? Quick wins. Need a break? Take one guilt-free.
Also, real talk: you only have about 5-6 truly productive hours in a day. Maybe less. So instead of pretending you'll work at 100% for 8 hours, plan around reality. Do your important work when you're sharp, and let the rest of the day be... normal.
Why This Works When Others Don't
It's low maintenance. I spend maybe 10 minutes a day planning. That's it. No weekly reviews, no processing inboxes, no maintaining complex contexts.
It adapts to my energy. Some days I have great focus. Some days my brain is mush. The system works either way because I'm matching tasks to energy, not forcing myself to do "important" things when I can barely think.
It's forgiving. Miss a day? No big deal. Just plan tomorrow. Don't finish everything? The world doesn't end. Anything important will surface again.
It's realistic. I'm not trying to be superhuman. I'm trying to get the right stuff done without burning out. The system supports that goal instead of fighting it.
But What About...?
"What about long-term projects?"
I keep a separate list of projects I'm working on. When planning my day, I make sure at least one task moves a project forward. But I'm not planning out every step—just aware of the next one.
"What about deadlines?"
I note deadlines separately. When planning my day, I check what's coming up and make sure deadline-related tasks make it into the plan. Your brain is good at working backwards from deadlines—you just need to be aware of them.
"What about meetings and events?"
Those go on my list of what needs to happen today. My daily plan shows both the things I need to do and the things that are happening to me. That way I can see my whole day at once and plan around reality.
"Isn't this just... normal to-do lists?"
Kind of, yeah. But the magic is in the simplicity. Most people overcomplicate this stuff (I definitely did). Sometimes the answer really is just: write stuff down, plan your day, do the things.
Your System Will Be Different (And That's Fine)
Here's the thing: my system might not work for you. And that's completely fine.
Actually, it probably won't work exactly as I described it. You'll need to tweak things. And you should.
The point isn't to copy my system. The point is to stop endlessly searching for the perfect productivity method and start paying attention to what actually works for your brain, your life, your work style.
Maybe you need more structure. Maybe you need less. Maybe you thrive on weekly reviews. Maybe you work better with paper. Whatever.
The best system is the one you'll actually use six months from now. Not the one that looks coolest or that some productivity guru swears by.
And here's something else: the best system is one that helps you remember what you did. Not just the work tasks, but everything. When I look back at my week and see the projects I finished, the walks I took, the time I spent on hobbies—that's when I realize I'm not just busy, I'm actually living.
Time feels like it's flying because we don't pay attention to it. We don't remember Tuesday. But if you track Tuesday—the work, the breaks, the moments—you'll remember it. And your weeks stop feeling like they disappeared.
So stop searching for the perfect system. Start with something simple, use it for a month, and adjust based on what's actually happening, not what should happen in theory.
This is basically how we designed Mindful Planner. Simple daily planning organized by energy level (deep work, quick wins, recharge). Plan your 5-6 productive hours realistically, then look back at your timeline to see your whole week, month, or year. You'll be surprised how much life you're actually living. Try it free and see if it works for your brain.